Isostatic Rebound
Isostatic Rebound is explained in detail in the following quote from Encyclopedia Galactica. Briefly though it is the response of the earth's crust to the additional weight of ice sheets laid upon it in the last ice age, and the continuing response of rising land as ice sheets are removed.
In my discussion of this enormously influential scientific discipline I am not trying to disprove the existence of Isostatic rebound, but I am questioning some of the evidence for it.
Quoted from:- Encyclopedia Galactica
"Introduction to Isostatic Rebound
Isostatic rebound represents one of the most profound yet subtle processes shaping our planet’s surface—a slow vertical dance of the Earth’s crust in response to changes in surface load. At its core, isostatic rebound describes the gradual rising of land previously depressed by the immense weight of ice sheets during glacial periods. This phenomenon operates on the principle of isostatic equilibrium, a state of gravitational balance analogous to an iceberg floating in water, where the Earth’s lithosphere “floats” on the denser, more plastic asthenosphere beneath. When heavy ice masses accumulate, they push the crust downward, much like adding weight to a ship causes it to ride lower in the water. Conversely, when these ice masses melt, the crust gradually rebounds upward, seeking to restore its equilibrium position. This process must be distinguished from eustatic sea level changes, which represent global changes in ocean water volume rather than local vertical movements of the crust. The interplay between isostatic and eustatic processes creates complex patterns of relative sea level change that vary dramatically across different regions of the globe.
The recognition of isostatic rebound as a geological phenomenon emerged gradually through careful observation and interpretation of landscape features. In Scandinavia during the late 19th century, Swedish geologist Gerard De Geer meticulously documented elevated shorelines and marine deposits far inland, realizing they represented ancient coastlines that had been uplifted following the retreat of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet.
His development of varve chronology—counting annually deposited sediment layers—provided crucial timing information about this uplift process. Around the same time, Scottish scientist Thomas Jamieson was puzzling over raised beaches in his native country, proposing in 1865 that the weight of glaciers had depressed the land, which subsequently rose after their melting. These early observations were revolutionary, challenging established geological thinking and requiring scientists to reconceptualize the Earth’s crust not as rigid and unchanging, but as responsive and dynamic. The intellectual journey from these first recog- nitions to our modern understanding spans nearly two centuries, involving contributions from geologists, geophysicists, geodesists, and many other specialists who gradually pieced together this global puzzle.
The scale and significance of isostatic rebound are truly remarkable when viewed across both space and time. Vertical movements of hundreds of meters have occurred in regions once buried beneath the thickest ice, with the center of the former Laurentide Ice Sheet around Hudson Bay still rising at rates exceeding 10 millimeters per year today. In Fennoscandia, the Gulf of Bothnia continues to emerge from the sea at similar rates, with the land having risen nearly 300 meters since the peak of the last glaciation. These movements operate on timescales ranging from immediate elastic responses to complete viscous relaxation spanning tens of thousands of years. The geographic footprint of significant rebound extends across vast areas of North America, northern Europe, Siberia, Antarctica, Patagonia, and numerous other regions glaciated during the Pleistocene epoch. Beyond its direct effects on land elevation, isostatic rebound influences global sea level patterns, triggers earthquakes, alters drainage systems, shapes ecosystems, and continues to impact human societies in profound ways."
Isostatic Rebound has become interwoven into the fabric of our understanding of Quaternary Science. It is assumed to be real because the assumptions that are used to qualify the processes of glaciation and deglaciation are accepted as factual.
Until recently I also accepted Quaternary Science as it is because, fact or not , it had no bearing on my life. That changed when I sought to understand how early humans were able to walk from Europe to Britain.
It is difficult to see the link there, between Quaternary Science and neolithic Britain, but I found one, (or two!)
A childhood experience also taught me that the most significant feature of the deglaciation of Britain and Scandinavia was that the melting of ice sheets in those places caused the draining of huge amounts of water off from high ground out to coastal waters.
The meltwater carried sediments and boulders, dumping them as they slowed, or as they reached water.
In my recent research i discovered that when meltwater reached coastal waters it raised sea-level locally. This raising of local sea levels was particularly pronounced when complex coastlines prevented the free flow of meltwater away from land.
In the published literature about relative sea-level around our coasts the evidence is found in seabed borings underwater, and in raised beaches, morainal dumps, and isolated lagoons on land.
Mollusc shells are markers, giving environmental, and carbon dating information, usually for a marine context.
Diatoms are markers for marine and brackish water in raised lagoons, and twigs, leaves, and peat samples tend to imply a terrestrial environment.
The following locations have been surveyed for various research purposes.
Kattegat
The Kattegat is a semi enclosed basin between Denmark and Sweden. It is largely shallow sea with narrow waterways leading south into the Baltic Sea.
North of the Kattegat is the Skagerrak, which in contrast to it, is very deep. North of the Skagerrak is southern Norway.
A boring was driven into the seabed here from a bed depth of 38 metres, and at about 41 metres below sealevel a group of mussels were found, a species that lives in groups on shorelines down to 5 metres below sealevel. This group of mussels would have been living in shallow water at this location in about 10,000BP.
On top of that, an additional 3 metres thick layer was dumped, in which were found random molluscs that were derived from deeper waters. The nearest deep water to the Kattegat is the Skagerrak, and it is most likely that a melt period occurred at around 10,000BP causing meltwater to enter the Skagerrak from Norway with enough force to scour out sediments and molluscs to dump them on the Kattegat.
This demonstrates that water and sediments were being moved around southern Scandinavia with considerable force. Also, as far as the floor of the Kattegat is concerned there is no evidence of isostatic rebound.
Tromsø
At Tromso in West Troms, North West Norway great deposits of mollusc bearing sediments have been described and recorded in detail by Bjorn Andersen. He has drawn sketch sections, and produced photographs for sources at over 70 metres above sealevel. These deposits contained huge bolders and molluscs from deep sea locations.
The mountains around Tromsø are huge....
....and the narrow inlets that incised the area would have channelled any sediment loaded meltwater deeply enough to leave molluscs and boulders on high ground.
Kola Peninsula
At the Kola Peninsula a group of four lakes were surveyed. The dating for the contents of the lakes, the highest of which was 54 metres above sealevel was provided by the carbon dating of mussel shells and algae, ie seaweed.
The seaweed growing in the intertidal region of coastline would have been attached to seabed ballast, including stones and molluscs at times and locations where sea-level was low,and when meltwater was not running. Evidence of a time when meltwater runoff was comparatively low is from Kattegat above, at about 10,000BP, when mussel beds were growing at a level equivalent to global sea level at the time.
Seaweed growing in fjords and inlets would have formed seaweed rafts, which would have been raised by the influx into the fjords of meltwater from elsewhere in Scandinavia. The seaweed would then have been pushed across the landscape until it arrived at the lagoon where it settled.
Seaweed rafts are a common feature of North Atlantic coasts, and they typically carry mussels with them that they have attached themselves to on the seashore, and that have been ripped up with them in winter storms.
Many other land based lagoons on coastal areas of Norway are similarly over-topped by the influx of seawater pushed into fjords and inlets by meltwater surges. These surges have left evidence of diatoms that are common to marine and brackish waters. The diatom population in these locations is one of the commoner means for establishing the relative sea-level of Northern European Coastlines.
Jeffery Nicholls
Orkney








































